This is simply an analogy for the way we approach unresolved and often heavily defended memories. In traditional 'talk therapy' a client and therapist will approach these memories together through
conversation. The client works verbally through the experience with the therapist, and together they hope to find some resolution.
In EMDR, a client approaches their memories internally without speaking. It might be thought of as something like rapelling downward into the darkness of one's subconscious. The therapist does not
go too, they cannot go too, because the experience is happening inside the client's mind and there are no words.
The client's main job during reprocessing is to maintain mental proximity to the distressing memory while their own Adaptive Information Processer (AIP), their own mind, works through the material
to complete what it never had a chance to do when the experience first occurred. This is adaptive resolution.
In between these brief (about one minute) 'sets' of reprocessing, the client will give one line summaries of what they just saw or felt as the healing work progresses.
The therapist's main job during reprocessing is to 'hold' the client energetically in safety to allow their minds to comfortably process some very difficult material that has been locked away in
their subconscious, oftentimes for many years, if not decades. Periodically, the client will find their process becomes 'stuck' (no longer progressing) and in these situations, the therapist will
offer suggestions for the next set. A therapist can do that, they can suggest, but they cannot actually join in the moment of reprocessing. Ultimately, it will always be the client who does their own
healing work in EMDR.
This is what I value most about EMDR *